← Back to the Board

Nissan 370Z Review: 47/70

2013+ Sport · 332 hp VQ37 · Manual

47 out of 70 · Buy the value pick

Buy a 2013-or-newer Sport, check the clutch cylinder and the oil history, and you have 332 horsepower worth owning. Skip it if you need a comfortable daily driver or if cheap horsepower is the goal.

Torque BrothersBuy or Skip
Nissan
370Z
Scored as 2013+ Sport · 332 hp VQ37 · Manual
47/70
Ownership 23/40 and Driving 23/30, each balanced to 35
Verdict: Buy the value pick
The Deal
8
~$18k for 332 hp RWD, a cheap route to that much power, and it's stopped depreciating.
The Drive
8
Old-school NA V6 that howls to 7,500, if heavier and dated.
The Upkeep
5
~$5,590/yr. Cheap to buy, thirsty to run on premium.
The Risk
6
The clutch cylinder is a known failure (class action). Check it.
The Daily
4
A usable hatch, but stiff, loud, and dated. A toy, not a commuter.
The Limit
8
0.94 g, RWD-playful, a track and drift staple. More fun than the new Z.
The Mods
7
Elite aftermarket for handling, but NA power is expensive.
Buy
Get a 2013+ Sport, and check the clutch cylinder and oil history before you buy. Skip it if you need a comfortable daily or cheap horsepower.
Cross-shop: a cheap route to 332 hp; just under the new Z (47), undercut on price only by the NC Miata torquebro.com

The Buyer's Guide

A buyer's guide built from our seven-category Board, and this one comes with real ownership behind it. Each section gives you the numbers first, then plain talk about what they mean for your decision. We scored the car as a 2013 or newer 370Z in Sport trim with the manual, and it landed at 47 out of 70, with a verdict of Buy as the cheap rear-drive entry, and check the clutch and the oil.

The one-line version of who this car is for: someone who wants an affordable way into a genuine rear-drive sports car, values engagement and character over refinement, and does not need it to be a comfortable daily. If that is you, read on. If you need one comfortable car that does everything, skip to The Daily first.

All money figures use a fixed set of assumptions so they can be compared to other cars we cover: 12,000 miles a year, premium fuel at $4.00 a gallon, and insurance for a 35-year-old driver with a clean record and full coverage. Insurance numbers are published averages, not personal quotes. Prices are from Kelley Blue Book.


The Deal

Figure370Z (2013+ Sport)
Used buy-in (KBB, Sport)~$18,000
Base cars from~$13,000
3-year resale retention~92% (bottomed out)
TrimsBase, Sport, Touring, Nismo
370Z vs the sports coupes 5 cars
Buy-in$18,000avg $27,22034% below
Full field, low to high: 370Z: $18,000; Miata ND: $19,500; GR86: $23,600; Nissan Z: $33,000; Supra 3.0: $42,000.
370Z $18,000Supra 3.0 $42,000
Per HP$54.2/hpavg $91.6/hp41% below
Full field, low to high: 370Z: $54.2/hp; Nissan Z: $82.5/hp; GR86: $103.5/hp; Miata ND: $107.7/hp; Supra 3.0: $109.9/hp.
370Z $54.2/hpSupra 3.0 $109.9/hp

~ our estimate, not a measured or quoted figure · * there is a caveat, and the note under the table explains it. Why we mark figures

This is the 370Z's winning category and the whole reason to consider one. About $18,000 buys a clean Sport, and base cars start near $13,000, which is very little money for a real 332-horsepower rear-drive sports car. If your decision starts from a budget and you want real power, this is the one to look at.

It also holds its money now. These cars have bottomed out and clean examples are flat or even climbing, so you are unlikely to lose much buying a good one. Be clear-eyed that this is a decade-old car that already took its depreciation, so the retention figure is not the same as a newer car holding value, but the practical result favors you. Buy the Sport trim specifically for its limited-slip diff, Akebono brakes, and rev-match; the base car misses the good hardware and the Nismo costs significantly more for gains most buyers do not need.


The Drive

Figure370Z (2013+)
Power-to-weight10.2 lb per hp
Power332 hp, 270 lb-ft
Curb weight~3,386 lb
0 to 60 mph~5.1 sec
Engine3.7L VQ37 NA V6, 7,500 redline
370Z vs the sports coupes 5 cars
Power332 hpavg 305 hp9% above
370Z
Full field, low to high: Miata ND: 181 hp; GR86: 228 hp; 370Z: 332 hp; Supra 3.0: 382 hp; Nissan Z: 400 hp.
Miata ND 181 hpNissan Z 400 hp
Pwr/Wt10.2 lb/hpavg 10.7 lb/hp4% below
370Z
Full field, low to high: Nissan Z: 8.9 lb/hp; Supra 3.0: 8.9 lb/hp; 370Z: 10.2 lb/hp; GR86: 12.4 lb/hp; Miata ND: 12.9 lb/hp.
Nissan Z 8.9 lb/hpMiata ND 12.9 lb/hp
0-605.1savg 4.9s4% above
370Z
Full field, low to high: Supra 3.0: 3.9s; Nissan Z: 4.5s; 370Z: 5.1s; GR86: 5.4s; Miata ND: 5.7s.
Supra 3.0 3.9sMiata ND 5.7s

The 370Z is old-school in the best and worst ways. Its naturally aspirated V6 revs to 7,500 and howls the whole way, a sound and a character no turbocharged rival in this class can offer, and the rev-match system makes downshifts feel great. It is quick enough at around 5.1 seconds to 60, and it has more outright power than a Miata or a GR86.

The honest trade is refinement. It feels heavier than the newer cars, the shifter is notchy, the brakes are grabby, and the cabin is dated. For a buyer who wants raw, analog character, that is the appeal in a nutshell. For a buyer who wants modern polish, it will feel every one of its years. Decide which of those matters more to you, because the 370Z commits hard to the analog side.


The Upkeep

Figure370Z (2013+)
Total annual running cost~$5,590/yr
Fuel~$2,286/yr (21 mpg, premium)
Insurance~$2,324/yr
Tires (amortized)~$480/yr
Routine service~$500/yr
Octane91 (premium)
Insurance class rank22nd of 115 sports cars
370Z vs the sports coupes 5 cars
Economy21 mpgavg 24.0 mpg12% below
Full field, low to high: 370Z: 21 mpg; Nissan Z: 22 mpg; GR86: 23 mpg; Supra 3.0: 25 mpg; Miata ND: 29 mpg.
370Z 21 mpgMiata ND 29 mpg

Cheap to buy is not the same as cheap to run, and the 370Z proves it. Running costs come to about $5,590 a year, driven mostly by a thirsty naturally aspirated engine that wants premium and returns only around 21 mpg combined. Wide staggered tires add to it, and insurance sits mid-pack rather than cheap.

For a buyer who spent so little to get in, that running cost is easy to accept, but you should plan for it rather than be surprised by it. The fuel line in particular is real, because the VQ drinks. This is a car that rewards a modest purchase budget and then asks for steady money at the pump, so factor that into whether it fits your life.


The Risk

Figure370Z (2013+)
Worst realistic repairClutch slave cylinder (~$900, transmission-out)
Signature issueCSC/CMC failure (class action + TSB)
Engine watch itemOil consumption (top up to protect timing chain)
Pre-2013 onlyOil-gallery gasket, electronic steering lock
Track noteFuel starvation in long corners
370Z vs the sports coupes 5 cars
Our score6avg 6.69% below
Full field, low to high: 370Z, GR86, Nissan Z: 6; Supra 3.0: 7; Miata ND: 8.
370Z, GR86, Nissan Z 6Miata ND 8

Here is where owning one pays off, so let me tell you what to actually check. Nearly every manual 370Z will meet the clutch slave cylinder problem, common enough to have triggered a class-action lawsuit and a service bulletin. It sits inside the gearbox, so the factory repair means dropping the transmission, but the smart fix is an external-conversion kit for a few hundred dollars. Budget for it and it is a footnote, not a disaster.

The engine item to watch is oil consumption: the VQ37 sips oil, so keep it topped up, because running it low risks stretching the timing chain. I take that seriously, because I had my engine replaced. The good news is that scoping to 2013 or newer removes two of the biggest historical issues, the oil-gallery gasket and the electronic steering lock, both pre-2013 problems. There is also a track fuel-starvation quirk in long corners that a baffle or second pump solves. The bottom line for your decision: this is a known, manageable, cheap-to-fix list, and the engine is genuinely durable if maintained. Do the checks and the risk is small.


The Daily

Figure370Z
Cargo volume6.9 cu ft
Seats2
Body styleHatchback
CharacterStiff, loud, dated cabin
370Z vs the sports coupes 5 cars
Our score4avg 4.817% below
Full field, low to high: 370Z, Miata ND: 4; Nissan Z, Supra 3.0: 5; GR86: 6.
370Z, Miata ND 4GR86 6

This is the 370Z's weakest category, and it is the one most likely to change your mind. You get a usable 6.9-cubic-foot hatch but only two seats, so there is cargo room and no people room. The ride is stiff, the highway is loud, and the interior and technology feel a decade behind, because they are.

It is livable, not comfortable. As a weekend car or a second vehicle, none of this matters and the car is a joy. As an only car that has to handle every commute and errand, the noise, harshness, and dated ergonomics add up quickly. If you have another vehicle, ignore this section. If the 370Z has to do everything, this is the honest cost of entry, and you should sit in one for a long test drive before you commit.


The Limit

Figure370Z (2013+ Sport)
Max grip0.94 g
60-0 braking108 ft (Edmunds, measured, Bridgestone RE050A)
70-0 braking~148 ft (conversion estimate, not the C&D 70-0 protocol)
Track hardwareSport: viscous LSD, Akebono brakes, Rays 19s
SCCA Solo classF Street (FS)
Track caveatFuel starvation and oil temps on long sessions
370Z vs the sports coupes 5 cars
Lateral g0.94 gavg 0.96 g2% below
370Z
Full field, low to high: Miata ND: 0.90 g; 370Z: 0.94 g; GR86, Nissan Z: 0.98 g; Supra 3.0: 1.02 g.
Miata ND 0.90 gSupra 3.0 1.02 g

SCCA F Street · shared with the G37, the 350Z and the Genesis Coupe on this Board.

This is where the 370Z earns its keep, and where I spent my seat time. It pulls 0.94 g, stops strongly on the Sport's Akebono brakes, runs a limited-slip diff, and has a playful, adjustable rear-drive balance that makes it a genuine track and drift favorite. In SCCA Solo the non-Nismo car runs F Street, next to the 350Z, the G37, and the C63 AMG; the Nismo sits a class up in B Street. It is more raw fun at the edge than the heavier, numb new Z, even giving up grip and power on paper.

The caveats are real and worth planning for: it starves for fuel in long corners and runs hot, so a fuel baffle and an oil cooler belong on the list if you track it seriously, and the rear will step out if you are not awake. For a buyer who wants an engaging, affordable car to actually drive hard, this category is the reason to say yes. Respect its quirks and it delivers a driving experience that punches far above its price.


The Mods

PathCostRisk
Handling / aero / lookscheap, deep aftermarketLow
Bolt-ons (NA)small money, ~20-40 hpLow
Forced induction (turbo/SC)~$6,000 to $9,000High
Big powerserious moneySevere
370Z vs the sports coupes 5 cars
Our score7avg 8.012% below
Full field, low to high: 370Z, Miata ND: 7; GR86: 8; Nissan Z, Supra 3.0: 9.
370Z, Miata ND 7Nissan Z, Supra 3.0 9

Two paths, and one of them is a trap. Handling, aero, and aesthetics are elite and cheap, because the 370Z shares a deep parts shelf with the 350Z and Infiniti G35. If your plan is to build a sharp-handling, great-looking car on a budget, this is a dream platform.

Power is where you need to think hard. It is a naturally aspirated V6, so bolt-ons barely move the needle, and real power means forced induction, roughly six to nine thousand dollars for a turbo or supercharger, plus the oiling support the engine needs to survive it. Unlike the turbocharged Supra and new Z, big horsepower here is expensive and involved. For most buyers, the right move is to build for handling and looks, enjoy the naturally aspirated character, and leave big power to people with big budgets. Go in knowing that, and the 370Z is one of the most rewarding cheap platforms around; expect cheap horsepower and you will be disappointed.


The Verdict

Buy a 2013-or-newer Sport, check the clutch cylinder and the oil history, and you have 332 horsepower worth owning. Skip it if you need a comfortable daily driver or if cheap horsepower is the goal.

This car is for you if you want an affordable way into genuine rear-drive fun, you value engagement and character over refinement, and you will do the one or two checks it needs. It is not for you if you need everyday comfort, modern tech, or an easy path to big power, in which case the new Z or another car in the class will serve you better. The 370Z is last on our Board on points, but it wins the value category outright, and for the right buyer that makes it a genuine bargain.

The Long Read: An Owner's Buy or Skip Verdict on the Nissan 370Z

So you wanna buy a 370Z. I owned one, so I will be straight with you: it is $18,000 for 332 horsepower, and there is one part that breaks on almost every single one. Whether you should buy it comes down to knowing that part exists and checking for it. Let me walk you through the whole car.

We scored it as a 2013-or-newer 370Z in Sport trim with the manual, and it landed at 47 out of 70. That is 47 out of 70, but do not let the number fool you, because it wins the category that matters most to a lot of buyers. Here is the story, section by section.

How much does a used 370Z cost?

This is the 370Z's whole appeal. A clean Sport runs about $18,000, and base cars start near $13,000. For that money you are getting a 332-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive sports car, roughly the price of a used economy sedan. It is the cheap entry to a proper rear-drive coupe.

And here is the part that surprises people: it has stopped depreciating. These cars have bottomed out, and clean examples are holding their money and in some cases creeping up as the last of the affordable naturally aspirated Japanese coupes. Be honest with yourself that this is a decade-old car that already took its depreciation hit, so it is not the same as a newer car holding value from a fresh purchase, but the practical result is the same: buy a good one and you are unlikely to lose money on it. Get the Sport trim specifically, because it brings the limited-slip differential, the bigger Akebono brakes, the Rays wheels, and rev-match. Base cars miss the good hardware, and the Nismo costs a lot more.

What is the 370Z like to drive?

Old-school, in the best and worst ways. The 332-horsepower naturally aspirated V6 revs to 7,500 and howls the whole way, something no turbocharged car in this class can give you. It runs to 60 mph in around 5.1 seconds, and the rev-match system blips the throttle for you on downshifts, which is still a genuinely satisfying trick years later.

The honest downsides are that it feels heavier than the newer stuff, the shifter is notchy, the brakes are grabby until you learn them, and the cabin is dated by modern standards. This is a raw, analog car in an era of polished ones. For the right buyer that is exactly the appeal. If you want refinement and modern tech, you will feel this car's age immediately, so know which of those two people you are.

Is the 370Z cheap to own?

Cheap to buy, not cheap to run. Expect about $5,590 a year. The thirsty naturally aspirated 3.7-liter wants premium fuel and returns only around 21 mpg combined, so fuel is the biggest line by a wide margin. Wide staggered tires add to it, and insurance is mid-pack, 22nd of 115 sports cars, so it is reasonable but not the bargain the purchase price is.

The takeaway is that the low buy-in hides turbo-car running costs. That is not a dealbreaker for most people, especially given how little you spent to get in, but do not assume a cheap car to buy is automatically a cheap car to own. Budget for the fuel, because the VQ engine drinks.

Is the 370Z reliable? The problems I learned to check for

I owned one, so let me tell you exactly what to look at, not what a listing tells you. There is one issue you will meet on almost every manual 370Z: the clutch slave cylinder. It has failed on so many of these cars that it triggered a class-action lawsuit and a service bulletin. The frustrating part is that it lives inside the gearbox, so the factory fix means dropping the transmission, but the smart move is an external-conversion kit for a few hundred dollars. Budget for it going in and it is a minor thing rather than a nasty surprise.

The engine item to watch is oil consumption. The VQ37 sips oil, so you have to keep it topped up, because running it low risks stretching the timing chain over time. I take this one seriously, because I had my engine replaced. And two older problems, the oil-gallery gasket and the electronic steering lock, were both pre-2013 issues, which is the single biggest reason we scope this car to 2013 or newer. Buy a later car and you sidestep both. There is also a track note: the 370Z can starve for fuel in long corners as the fuel slides away from the pickup, and a baffle or a second pump fixes it. The honest verdict is a known, manageable list, all of it cheap-ish, and an engine that is genuinely tough if you keep oil in it.

Can a 370Z be your only car?

This is the weakest part of the car, and I felt it living with one. You get a 6.9-cubic-foot hatch and two seats, so there is some cargo room but no space for people. The ride is stiff, especially on the Sport, it is loud on the highway, and the interior and tech are well behind anything modern.

It is livable, not comfortable. As a fun weekend or second car it is brilliant. As your only car, it asks you to put up with a fair amount of noise, harshness, and dated ergonomics every single day. If you have another vehicle in the household, this barely matters. If the 370Z has to do everything, go in with your eyes open about what a daily grind in one actually feels like.

Is the 370Z good on track?

This is where the 370Z earns its keep, and where I spent most of my time in mine. It pulls 0.94 g of grip, stops hard thanks to the Sport's Akebono brakes, runs a limited-slip differential, and has a playful, adjustable rear-drive balance that makes it a genuine track-day and drift staple. If you want to race it, the non-Nismo car classes into F Street in SCCA Solo, with the Nismo bumped up to B Street. Honestly, it is more raw fun at the edge than the heavier, numb new Z, even though it gives up grip and power on paper.

The caveats I learned the hard way: it starves for fuel in long corners and it runs hot, so a fuel baffle and an oil cooler are on the list if you track it seriously, and the rear will step out if you are not paying attention. That last part is a feature or a warning depending on your skill and your mood. Buy it, respect it, and it rewards you in a way few cheap cars do.

Best 370Z mods: where the money goes

Two paths, and one of them is a trap. Handling, aero, and looks are elite and cheap, because the 370Z shares a deep parts shelf with the 350Z and the Infiniti G35. You can build a gorgeous, razor-sharp handling car for very little money, and that is genuinely the smart way to modify this car.

Power is the trap. It is a naturally aspirated V6, so bolt-ons barely move it, maybe 20 to 40 horsepower for real money. Actual power means forced induction, roughly six to nine thousand dollars for a turbo or supercharger, and the engine needs oiling support to survive it. So unlike the turbocharged Supra and new Z, big horsepower here is expensive and involved. My advice is to build it for handling and looks, enjoy the naturally aspirated character, and do not chase big numbers unless you are ready to spend real money.

370Z vs the new Nissan Z: which should you buy?

This is the obvious comparison, old Z versus new Z, and it is closer than you would think. The 370Z is far cheaper, more raw and engaging at the limit, and it holds its value. The new Z is much faster, has a huge turbo mod ceiling, and is more comfortable, but it is heavier and numb by comparison. On our Board the new Z edges ahead, 47 to 46, but the 370Z is the purist's and the value buyer's pick.

So the choice is about what you want from the car. If you want maximum power potential and modern comfort, the new Z is worth the extra money. If you want an engaging, affordable way into a rear-drive Nissan coupe, and you like the analog naturally aspirated character, the 370Z is still the more charming car. They are two very different takes on the same idea.

370Z buy or skip: the verdict

Buy a 2013-or-newer Sport, check the clutch cylinder and the oil history, and you have 332 horsepower worth owning. Skip it if you need a comfortable daily driver or if you want cheap horsepower, because neither is what this car does.

The 370Z finished at 47 out of 70, last in its segment, but that number is the sum of a dated daily and expensive power potential dragging down a car that is genuinely brilliant where it counts. It lands level with the Miata ND on the Deal, with the budget-tier NC Miata the only cheaper car we have scored, and it is genuinely engaging at the limit. For the buyer who wants a cheap, characterful, rear-drive toy and will do the one or two checks it needs, it is a bargain that is hard to argue with.

Filming reference: cue sheet · for the hosts on set, not part of the review.

The end card

The frame that closes the video. 370Z at 47/70, with the Nissan Z and the Supra 3.0 alongside. Take it and use it.

Torque Brothers end card for the Nissan 370Z: 47 out of 70