Format: bullet cues only, reference not read-aloud. Hosts riff from beats, never teleprompter the page.
Scored as: 2013-2016 facelift, 3.8 V6, 6MT · Total: 40/70 (PROPOSED, not ratified) · Target runtime: ~6:40, hard ceiling 7:00
Title (curiosity gap): "Nothing Is Wrong With This Car. That's The Problem."
Thumbnail word (emotion/verdict, zero overlap w/ title): "NEGLECTED" + big 43 on the Board
Order: Deal -> Drive -> Upkeep -> Risk -> Daily -> Limit -> Mods -> Board -> Verdict

---

Hook | One Sentence (~0:05)

1. "Every other cheap car we've reviewed is a good car with a defect. This one's a good car people just didn't service."
2. "Three hundred and forty-eight horsepower, eight and a half grand, and the only thing wrong with it is the last owner."
3. "In our budget tier, buying the good version of this one costs you nothing."

Recommend #1: it sets up the whole inversion. Cut straight to The Deal.

---

1 · The Deal, reveal 8 (~0:50)

Beats

• $8,425 · KBB private party, Good, 120,000 mi · range $6,725 to $8,875
• $24.2 per horsepower, against the 350Z's $18.7 and the G37's $21.2
• The rare one: the better version is INSIDE the budget. 2013 facelift brings 348 hp against 306 and a fixed interior, and still fits the band
• Every other car forced a compromise. The Mustang GT priced out. The G37's good years priced out. This one doesn't
• The depreciation is brutal, and it cuts both ways: a 2011 R-Spec sits at $3,060, below our tier floor. The same model two years later is nearly triple
• That's the buying opportunity and the resale warning in one number

B-roll: live cars.com search, 2013-16 under $12k · screen-record the grid at edit time
On screen: the $8,425 plate · 2011-vs-2013 price wall · $/hp ladder
Reveal line cue: "Three hundred and forty-eight horsepower, and the good one is in budget... The Deal scores an 8."

---

2 · The Drive, reveal 5 (~0:45)

Beats

• 348 hp / 295 lb-ft · 3,483 lb · 10.0 lb/hp · rear-wheel drive
• On paper that reads ahead of the 350Z's and G37's 10.9
• And we are not going to claim it on camera. Say why, because the honesty is the beat:

- the published 0-60 is 5.9 seconds, which is slower than the 350Z's 5.6
- a better power-to-weight and a worse 0-60 cannot both be right
- the source for that 5.9 is dead, so we cannot resolve which figure is wrong
- a superlative a viewer can disprove with a stopwatch is not worth having

• So no 0-60 on our card at all, and no "best power-to-weight" line
• Scope beat: 348 hp is the 2013+ car. The pre-facelift is 306

On screen: 10.0 lb/hp with a question mark over it · the 5.9-vs-5.6 contradiction side by side · "WE WON'T CLAIM THIS" stamp
Reveal line cue: "A number we won't stand behind... The Drive, a 5."

---

3 · The Upkeep, reveal 6 (~0:50)

Beats

• ~$4,936/yr: $2,286 fuel · ~$1,900 insurance [ESTIMATE] · $300 tires · $450 service
• The correction, and it was our own headline: we had this as "it runs on regular"

- It is wrong. Edmunds at trim level says premium recommended on the 3.8
- the $286/yr advantage does not exist. It is exactly level with the Mazdaspeed3 and the WRX
- own it on camera. We caught it before publishing and that is the point

• 21 mpg combined on the 6MT, 18 city / 27 highway
• MoneyGeek publishes no Genesis Coupe page at either slug, so the insurance line is an estimate bounded by the 350Z and 370Z
• We cannot dollar-compare this to the 370Z, which is the comparison people want. Rank only

On screen: "RUNS ON REGULAR" struck through, replaced with "PREMIUM RECOMMENDED" · running-cost stack with the insurance bar marked ESTIMATE
Reveal line cue: "No fuel advantage, and softer sourcing than we like... The Upkeep, a 6."

---

4 · The Risk, reveal 8 (~1:10)

Beats (this segment is the review, and it inverts the whole tier)

• Scope out loud first: 2013 to 2016
• The thesis: every other car down here is a good car with a design defect. This is a sound car that was neglected
• 350Z: a slave cylinder that fails regardless of care. G37: a paper gasket. Mazdaspeed3: a fuel pump. WRX: a ringland. Civic Si: a synchro
• Genesis Coupe: a valve adjustment the manufacturer specified at 60,000 miles, which owners skip
• The Lambda II RS is described as very reliable and a very solid power plant. There is no design flaw to inspect around
• At our 120,000-mile basis that valve service is TWICE overdue by definition
• And it is audible. Ticking at operating temperature. That is the whole check and it costs nothing
• It is also a fixable risk: a documented valve service turns this from a question mark into a sound engine
• The rest is ordinary: oil leaks past 100k, a timing chain tensioner, carbon on a GDI engine, a nav dropout a hard reset clears

PPI CHECKLIST - hold it on screen

1. Listen for valve ticking at operating temperature. This is the check
2. Ask for the 60,000-mile valve service record. No record means assume about $1,000
3. Cold start, listen for timing chain rattle
4. Underneath: valve cover, oil pan and main seal for weeping
5. Confirm 2013 or later, 348 hp, not a 306 hp car
6. Borescope the intake valves if the seller allows

YEAR-ONE COST

• Valves and leaks documented ~$1,200-1,800 · Typical ~$3,000-3,900 · Neglected ~$4,500-6,800
• Neglected is 53-81% of the $8,425 buy-in
• The valve figure is our estimate, not a sourced quote. Say so if the number goes on screen

On screen: the five-car defect list with this car's row reading "NONE" · valve-tick audio waveform · service-record close-up
Reveal line cue: "Nothing wrong with the car, everything wrong with the last owner... The Risk, an 8."

---

5 · The Daily, reveal 6 (~0:30)

Beats

• Four seats, two doors, and a real trunk. A genuine 2+2, not a token one
• Clear of the Miata and 350Z on both counts, well behind the WRX hatch, Civic Si and Mazdaspeed3
• The 2013 facelift matters here more than anywhere else: the pre-facelift cabin was the car's most-criticised feature
• That is a real reason not to buy the cheaper years, on top of the 42 horsepower
• Navigation on Grand Touring trims. No CarPlay
• Cargo reads Not captured. We didn't source it

On screen: rear seats and trunk against the 350Z's · pre-facelift vs facelift interior side by side
Reveal line cue: "A proper 2+2, and a cabin they fixed... The Daily, a 6."

---

6 · The Limit, reveal 4 (~0:40)

Beats

• SCCA F Street, and this one is verified, read straight out of the 2026 Appendix A in direct context
• No asterisk, unlike the Civic Si, Mazdaspeed3 and WRX
• Turn the verification round on it: a verified class is a verified run sheet, and the run sheet is the problem
• Four cars on our Board now share F Street: the 350Z, the G37, this, and the 370Z. Three of them are why this scores a 4
• The company: 370Z at 0.94 g and 148 ft, Limit 8 · 350Z at 3,320 lb, Limit 7 · G37, Limit 6
• This car: RWD, two doors, 3,483 lb, and no instrumented grip or braking figure for the scored car
• 163 lb more than the 350Z and nothing measured to argue back with
• Appendix A's own year range is 2013-15, which independently corroborates our facelift scope. SCCA treats the 348 hp car as a different animal — that bonus belongs to the scope, not the score

On screen: the F Street list with all four Board cars highlighted · the three rivals' figures stacked against this car's two blanks · four price tags under one class banner
Reveal line cue: "Entered in the same class as the 370Z. Entered is not the same as competitive... The Limit, a 4."

---

7 · The Mods, reveal 4 (~0:30)

Beats (the shortest segment in this script, and honestly so)

• A Mods score of 3
• The aftermarket is thin
• The Lambda II RS is a sound engine that tuners simply never adopted the way they did the VQ, EJ or K-series
• Naturally aspirated, direct injected, and unloved
• Third distinct reason for a "no" on mods accelerating failure: NC Miata, because the engine is tough. Civic Si, partial, because the gearbox is the limit. This one, because nobody makes the parts
• The honest answer, and it is a finding rather than a hedge: this is a car to enjoy stock

On screen: empty parts shelf against the WRX's and Civic Si's · "NOTHING TO BUY" stamp
Reveal line cue: "A good engine nobody built anything for... The Mods, a 4."

---

The Board + Verdict (~0:50)

Beats

• Total lands: 43 / 70, and it is a proposed score
• A three-way tie with the Mazdaspeed3 and the GTI Mk6, and three points behind the 370Z it is directly cross-shopped against
• The Limit cut from 6 to 4 is where two of those points went — same F Street entry, nowhere near the same F Street car
• The shape: a clean risk profile, a thin aftermarket, and a class it is outgunned in
• Land the inversion one more time: everything else down here needs inspecting around a defect. This one just needs a service record
• VERDICT: "Buy a 2013 or newer with the valve service documented."
• Skip case: you want to modify it, or you want the 370Z's chassis and badge and can find $9,500 more

On screen: the 43 landing in a three-way tie · $8,425 vs the 370Z's $18,000 · Buy stamp with the valve-service condition
Close cue: one line pointing at the 370Z review · end

---

Runtime + notes

• Sum ~ 6:40. The Risk carries the extra runtime again, though for the opposite reason to every other car in this tier. If it runs long, pull from The Mods, which is already the shortest.
• All seven scores are proposals. The Risk (8) is the one to argue about, since it rests on the absence of a defect rather than the presence of a fix.
• Do not say on camera: that it runs on regular, any power-to-weight claim, a 0-60 figure, or this car's insurance compared to the 370Z's in dollars.
• B-roll warning: listings are asking prices, the $8,425 is KBB private-party. Name which is which.
• The four-car F Street class is a standalone video: 350Z, G37, Genesis Coupe, 370Z, all legal in the same run group.
• Title and thumbnail share zero words per channel rule.